Hey Hollywood, Dinosaurs had Feathers

August 1, 2015

I enjoyed the first Jurassic Park movie when it premiered in 1993.  But even then, scientists were aware that some dinosaurs had feathers, and I always thought it was a bad oversight to depict every dinosaur in the movie as featherless.  Over the past 2 decades, paleontologists have discovered 43 species of dinosaurs that definitely had feathers.  These species ranged in size from the small tyrannosauroid, Dilong paradoxis, to the huge yutyrannus.  There’s no evidence Tyrannosaurus rex had feathers, but scientists believe it’s highly likely they were at least partially feathered because the 2 species mentioned above were related to T. rex.  The failure to depict dinosaurs with feathers in this year’s version of Jurassic Park is inexcusable, and I refuse to watch a movie produced by Hollywood shmucks who don’t bother to acknowledge scientific fact.  The movie is an insult to paleontology.

Artist's impression and fossil specimen of Sinosauropteryx

Note the visible quill feathers on the fossilized impression of a Sinusopteryx.

 

Yutyrannus, a relative of T. rex, is the largest known dinosaur that had feathers.

Feathers evolved from membrane-like structures that can still be found on the dorsal spines of reptiles and fish.  Originally, feathers served 2 purposes–thermal regulation and reproductive display.  Birds arose from a dinosaur order known as Dromaeosauridae, and these dinosaurs probably behaved like birds.  The males displayed their colorful feathers to attract the females for mating.  Most people, when they think of dinosaurs, imagine terrible monsters tearing each other apart.  They don’t realize these beasts had mating rituals that included males spreading their feathers and dancing and probably vocalizing while a discriminating female watched.  I suppose this interesting behavior is too mundane for a big budget action movie.  Hollywood shmucks would rather show dinosaurs running amok and terrorizing humans.  In truth (if dinosaurs somehow co-existed with people in a fictionalized scenario) a few humans with high powered rifles could destroy a whole herd of dinosaurs in a disgusting slaughter that would not be entertaining at all.

Most Media Outlets Misreport A New Study Linking Interstadials with Pleistocene Megafauna Extinctions

July 28, 2015

A new study of Pleistocene megafauna extinctions published in the latest issue of Science received considerable publicity.  Most of the media outlets misrepresented the study’s conclusions.  Perhaps journalists were confused by the title of the article: “Abrupt Warming Events Drove Late Pleistocene Holarctic Turnover.”  The overwhelming majority of media outlets reported that the study suggests climate, not overhunting by man caused the late Pleistocene megafauna extinctions.   None of these journalists must have read the abstract because the last sentence of it concedes that man played an important role in megafauna extinctions.  The following passage is the last sentence of the abstract (capital letters mine).

The presence of many cryptic biotic transitions prior to the Pleistocene/Holocene boundary revealed by ancient DNA confirm the importance of climate change in megafaunal population extinctions and suggests that METAPOPULATION STRUCTURES NECESSARY TO SURVIVE SUCH REPEATED AND RAPID CLIMATE SHIFTS WERE SUSCEPTIBLE TO HUMAN IMPACTS.”

This means the authors of this study believe rapid climate change reduced and scattered megafaunal populations, making them more vulnerable to human hunting.  They make it clear that humans were ultimately responsible for the megafauna extinctions in the last 2 sentences of the main body of this study.

Human presence could have had a major and negative impact on metapopulations by interrupting subpopulation connectivity, especially by concentrating on regular pathways between resource-rich zones, potentially leaving minimal sign of direct hunting.  By interrupting metapopulation processes (i.g. dispersal, recolonization), humans could have both exacerbated regional extinctions brought on by climate change and allowed them to coalesce, potentially leading to the eventual regime shifts and collapses observed in megafaunal ecosystems.  The lack of evidence for longer such ecological shifts during earlier periods of the glacial (i.g. >45 kyr) when interstadial events were known, but humans were not, suggests a synergistic role for humans in exacerbating the impacts of climate change and extinction in terminal events.”

The authors of this study collected no original data.  Instead, they analyzed data already available from previous studies.  They plotted climate data from Greenland Ice Cores with studies of megafauna DNA that determined changes over time in population structures.  (Scientists can determine past average annual temperatures by analyzing oxygen isotope ratios in Greenland ice cores that go back 100,000 years.  These ice cores have annual rings from summer glacial melt.)  The scientists used genetic data from 31 species, including 2 from North America (mastodon and elk), 3 from Beringia, and 26 from Eurasia.  They found a close correlation between sudden warming pulses, known as Dansgaard-Oeschger Events, and reduced populations and local extinctions of megafauna.   Dansgaard-Oeschger Events precipitated interstadials (warm climatic phases) within the Ice Age that lasted for 1-3 thousand years.  In some regions some species of megafauna became locally extinct.  Later, when the climate returned to a cooler more arid stage, different clades of the same species recolonized these regions from relic refugia where they found suitable habitat during the interstadial.

DO and Heinrich events

Chart showing Greenland Ice Core data.  This data shows past average annual temperature fluctuations.  The arrows point to Dansgaard-Oeschger Events–abrupt warming events that caused brief interstadials during the Ice Age.  Prior to the appearance of Homo sapiens in Europe, these interstadials were not associated with local extirpations of megafauna species.  But after modern man colonized Eurasia, various species of megafauna did suffer local extinctions following Dansgaard-Oeschger events.  Sudden climate change made these species more vulnerable to human overhunting, according to the study linked below.

Populations of megafauna remained stable during stadials, the cold phases of the Ice Ages, because the environments they lived in were static.  Stadials were longer lasting than interstadials, and open grassy plains prevailed for millennia.  The megafauna became adapted to living in these environments.  But rapid warming with increased precipitation caused dramatic changes to the environment.  Unproductive spruce forests started expanding, and this fragmented and reduced grassland habitat, forcing megafauna to migrate longer distances for suitable pasturage.  They followed the same routes between pastures, making them easier for humans to ambush.

I have a couple quibbles with this study.  First, I think this study is not applicable to North America.  The overwhelming majority of genetic data is from Eurasian populations of megafauna.  Just 2 North American species were used–a database that is far too small upon which to base any conclusions.  Moreover, I hypothesize mastodon populations likely increased during interstadials because they were a semi-aquatic species that favored wetland habitat.  Warm wet interstadials caused wetlands to expand. The scientists involved in this study used genetic data from just a single population of mastodons.  I’m extremely skeptical that mastodons declined in abundance when wetland habitat expanded.

Second, the authors note woolly mammoths survived later in Eurasia than in North America, despite having a longer exposure to human hunting there.  I assume they were making the point that climate played a greater role than human hunting in regulating megafauna populations.  Indeed, a radio-carbon date of 9760 BP from a woolly mammoth rib found in northern Russia is more recent than a 10,800 BP date from the latest mammoth specimen from continental North America.  However, the latter very likely does not represent the last mammoth that ever lived in North America, and sedaDNA from Alaska permafrost suggests mammoths still lived in Alaska 9000 calendar years ago.  Mammoths may have lasted longer in North America–there just isn’t enough data to know for sure.  It’s unlikely that the absolute last mammoth was preserved.  Moreover, northern Russia was probably uninhabited or more sparsely inhabited than most of North America during the late Pleistocene, rendering the author’s point moot.

Reference:

Cooper, Alan; et. al.

“Abrupt Warming Events Drove Late Pleistocene Holarctic Megafaunal Turnover”

Science 2015

http://www.researchgate.net/publication/280302381_Abrupt_warming_events_drove_Late_Pleistocene_Holarctic_megafaunal_turnover

An Article I Wrote for the Wildernist Magazine

July 23, 2015

I wrote an article for the Wildernist Magazine entitled “The History of Bison in Southeastern North America.”

Here’s a link to the article http://www.thewildernist.org/2015/07/history-bison-southeastern-north-america/

Ice Age Aridity Caused Pitcher Plant Speciation

July 22, 2015

North American pitcher plants belong to the sarracenia genus.  A study of sarracenia genetics determined the 11 species in this genus diverged about 4 million years ago.  This is when Ice Ages began occurring.  Pitcher plants grow in wetlands and moist meadows where the ground is saturated.  These acidic soils contain low levels of nutrients, so pitcher plants obtain additional nutrition by trapping insects in their modified leaves.  Other plants outcompete them on drier richer soils.  Glacial expansion caused environmental change in southeastern North America.  Dry oak scrub and prairie replaced wetlands and moist meadows and became the prevailing type of environment in this region.  Ice Age pitcher plants grew in relic marshes that managed to remain wet because of local conditions.  Pitcher plant populations became isolated from each other for long enough to evolve into different species.

Sarracenia flava var. ornata

 A yellow pitcher plant (Sarracenia flava variation ornate).  The hood keeps the pitcher from overfilling with rainwater.

The Okefenokee variety of the hooded pitcher plant.  There are 2 varieties of hooded pitcher plant.  The Okefenokee variety is tall and catches flying insects.  The other variety is short and more likely to trap ants.

I studied the range maps of all 11 species of pitcher plants. It appears as if there were 3 main refuges for pitcher plants during Ice Ages (assuming modern ranges reflect the locations of Ice Age refuges).  Hooded pitcher plants (Sarracenia minor) survived in some relic habitats on the Atlantic coastal plain.  Purple pitcher plants (S. purpurea) survived in relic Atlantic coastal plain and Gulf Coast habitats.  The pale pitcher plant (S. alata) and the white-topped pitcher plant (S. leucophylla) survived on relic habitat near the Gulf Coast.  The parrot pitcher plant (S. psitticina) and the yellow pitcher plant (S. flava) survived in the Atlantic coastal plain relic habitat and spread west following the end of the Ice Age or they survived in Gulf Coast relic habitat and spread east following the end of the Ice Age.  I can’t determine which scenario it was by just looking at range maps.  The green pitcher plant (S. oreophila) and the Alabama pitcher plant (S. alabamensis) survived in relic bogs located in the southern Appalachians.

Sarracenia minor range.png

Range map for hooded pitcher plant.  During the Ice Age they must have survived on relic habitat located on the Atlantic coastal plain.

Sarracenia alata range.png

Pale pitcher plant range map.  They became reproductively isolated from hooded pitcher plants when Ice Age aridity dried up wetlands between ancestral populations.

Sarracenia leucophylla range.png

Range map for white-topped pitcher plant–another species that survived near the Gulf Coast during Ice Ages.

Range map for Sarracenia purpurea, the only species of pitcher plant that colonized formerly glaciated regions.  There are several subspecies.

Pitcher plants originated in South America at least 50 million years ago and eventually split into 3 genera.  There are 18 species of pitcher plants in the South American heliophora genus.  Pitcher plants invaded North America from South America by island hopping across the Caribbean.  During the Eocene there was a chain of islands between the 2 continents.  Pitcher plant seeds float, allowing them to spread via water.  Eventually, these islands were inundated, and the foundling North American population became isolated.  Pitcher plants expanded their range across North America in the tropical wet climate of the Oligocene.  North American pitcher plants diverged into 2 genera by the Miocene, about 25 million years ago.  One species in the darlingtonia genus occurs in northern California and southern Oregon where it grows on serpentine seeps and in interdunal wetlands.  The other genera–sarracenia–thrives in the southeast with the exception of S. purpurea which ranges into Canada, the northeast, and the southeast.

Pitcher plants are an evolutionary marvel.  They’ve evolved a nectar that attracts insects, and a slippery leaf pit that traps the luckless arthropods.  Bacterial action in rainwater collected in the pit helps digest the protein.  All these plants needed to evolve these adaptations was time and chance.

Reference:

Ellison, A.M.; et. al.

“Phylogeny and Biogeography of the Carnivorous Plant Family Sarracenia”

Plos One 7 (1) 2012

Exciting New Vertebrate Faunas in Georgia and Florida

July 18, 2015

North America suffered a devastating loss of vertebrate diversity about 10,000 years ago when men overhunted the most impressive species on the continent to extinction.  So it’s ironic that man is now the agent adding species to North America’s fauna by transporting them from other continents.  The new arrivals that survive are often the species most difficult for man to eradicate, unlike the maladapted Pleistocene megafauna.  Silly alarmists refer to these species as invasive (as if man himself was not invasive and belongs everywhere).  Most are beneficial additions that increase diversity to an environment left impoverished by the end Pleistocene extinction and the activities of industrial age man.  I’m rooting for the “invaders” and against wildlife officials attempting exterminate the newcomers.

The walking catfish (Claria batrachus) is an amazing import from Indonesia. It has been slithering around Florida since the 1960s, and fishermen have begun catching them in the Flint River, Georgia.  It lives in mud puddles, flooded roadside ditches, and other ephemeral bodies of water; and accordingly does not compete with native fishes.  Studies show it takes fewer tadpoles than native mosquito fish and does not pose an undue threat to amphibians.  They have the ability to wriggle across the ground and seek bodies of water when their puddle dries up, making them well adapted to Florida’s fluctuating water levels.

Walking Catfish (Clarias batrachus) make their way across land to spawn in small rainpools Stock Photo

The walking catfish is well adapted to environments with fluctuating water levels.

The Nile tilapia (Oreochronis niloticus) is a native of Africa.  They’ve lived in the lower Chattahoochee River, Lake Seminole, and the Apalachicola River since 1991.  Though they inhabit shallow water, studies show they don’t compete with native fish in the wild.  Tilapia is by far the best tasting and most reliable fish sold in the supermarket.  Wild tilapia has dark meat.  Farmed tilapia have been bred to have white meat because it is visibly more appealing.

Photo1

Nile tilapia.  Disjunct populations of this species live throughout the southeast.  This is by far the best tasting and most reliable fish in the supermarket.

The black and white tegu (Salvator merianae) is a South American lizard that can grow up to 4 feet long.  This recent escapee has established scattered populations from north Florida to Miami.  They eat alligator and turtle eggs.  There is an overpopulation of alligators and turtles in Florida, so wildlife managers should be thrilled.  Instead, they want to eradicate them.  Black bears were abundant in Florida until late in the 19th century and were formerly a major consumer of alligator and turtle eggs.  Tegus are merely occupying a niche left vacant by the extirpation of black bears.  Along with Nile monitor lizards, another recent colonizer of Florida’s wilds, they are providing a much needed predator in the local ecosystem.

Tegu in Florida

Black and white tegus.  These beneficial predators could help reduce the overpopulation of alligators and turtles in Florida.  The Florida Wildlife Commission asks people to report where these lizards are.  Do not report sightings.  Those redneck assholes at the FWC will just come out and kill them.

The spectacled caiman (Caiman crocodilus) is a South American crocodilian that’s been living in southeast Florida since the 1960s.  They are intolerant of cold and can’t expand their range north.  They’re smaller than alligators had have been unable to displace them.

spectacled-caiman

Spectacled caimans now live in southeast Florida.  Cool!

The monk parakeet (Miopsitta monachus) is another native of South America.  This colorful bird has established colonies in New York City, Chicago, Miami, and parks in other cities.  They build huge stick nests that are used by many other species of birds.  Park officials like them because they drive away city pigeons.  Pigeon dung is difficult and costly to remove from statues.  The monk parakeet is an obvious aesthetic replacement for the extinct Carolina parakeet.

Monk parakeet nest in Miami, Florida.  They also live as far north as Chicago and New York City.  Other species of birds use their nests.  Monk parakeets drive away city pigeons.

Fallow deer (Dama dama) are native to Eurasia.  Hunters introduced them to south Georgia early in the 20th century.  This deer varies in color from brownish-red with spots to pure white.  The white individuals are not albino.  They’re raised on ranches and some have escaped, and wild herds live on St. Simon’s Island, Georgia.

Fallow deer on St. Simon’s Island, Georgia.  The white variety is common.

Two-hundred ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta), a native of Madagascar, roam St. Catherine’s Island, Georgia.  The island serves as an emergency refuge in case they ever become extinct in their native land.  Wildlife officials supplement their diet because the island might not provide enough natural foods.  This is not a problem for the 3 non-native species of primate that have successfully established breeding populations in Florida–rhesus macaques, vervet monkeys, and spider monkeys.

044

Ring-tailed lemurs at the North Georgia Zoo.  A semi-wild population of 200 lives on St. Catherine’s Island, Georgia.  They’re kept there in case the population on Madagascar becomes extinct.

Cave ACb-3 in Colbert County, Alabama

July 14, 2015

Rain water began eroding a limestone outcrop located in what today is northwestern Alabama over 228,000 years ago.  The slightly acidic rain dissolved the rock in all directions creating what is known as a phreatic cave system.  Crevices provided shelter for small animals including wood rats, squirrels, rabbits, shrews, spotted skunks, bats, lizards, and snakes.  Scientists have yet to describe the remains of these smaller creatures in the scientific literature, demonstrating that the amount of fossil material available for study exceeds the time qualified scientists have to study it.  About 172,000 years ago rain water began channeling through 1 stream in the cave, creating a rectangular trench.  This is known as a vadose cave because it has a dome shaped ceiling with a rectangular floor.  A cave entrance enlarged allowing big mammals such as  Jefferson’s ground sloth, beautiful armadillo, white tail deer, long-nosed peccary, tapir, giant beaver, bobcat, wolf, and sabertooth inside.  This composition of species suggests a wooded environment prevailed locally.

The abundant speloethems (cave formation mineral deposits) and their positions gave scientists the opportunity to date the fossil remains, or rather to bracket the age range within which these vertebrates lived.  The bone-bearing sediments were found underneath and between calcium carbonate flowstone that could be dated using uranium-thorium dating.  (Coral can also be dated using this method.) Uranium 234 decays to thorium 230 at a known rate and by measuring the amount of each and by plugging the values into a mathematical formula, scientists can determine the age.  Uranium-thorium dating can date objects up to 500,000 years old, far exceeding the 50,000 year limit of radio-carbon dating.  Uranium-lead dating can be used to estimate the age of an object that is billions of years old.  Cave ACb-3 accumulated vertebrate remains between ~228,000 BP-~121,000 BP, roughly coinciding with the Illinois Ice Age and the Sangamonian Interglacial.  After this, the cave entrance became sealed until recently.

Calcium carbonate flowstone in a cave. 

Types of cave formations.  They can be dated using Uranium-Thorium series dating.

A few years ago, Sharon Holte studied the 7 skeletons of Jefferson’s ground sloth that were found in this cave, and she wrote about her findings in her Masters Thesis.  She found injuries on the shoulder blades and arm bones that suggested intraspecific fighting.  The males likely sparred over mating rights.  Ground sloths had powerful arms and huge claws and could have easily killed an unarmed man with raking paw blows.  However, ground sloths had thick fur and armor, enabling them to endure intraspecific battles most of the time.  Sharon Holte also speculates body change occurred over time within the population of Jefferson’s ground sloths.  They evolved from stout and robust during cooler climate phases to longer and thinner during warmer climate phases.  I think the sample size from this cave is too small to come to any conclusion about evolving body shape.

adult dorsal

Ground sloth shoulder blade from specimen found in Iowa.  Shoulder blade and arm bones of Jefferson’s ground sloths found in Cave ACb-3 show evidence of intraspecific fighting.

References:

Holte, Sharon

“Description of Jefferson’s Ground Sloth (Megalonyx jeffersonii) from ACb-3 Cave, Colbert County, Alabama, with comments about Ontogeny, Taphonomy, Pathology, and Paleoecology”

Masters Thesis East Tennessee State University 2012

Lively, R.S.; G. L. Bell, and J.P. Lamb

“Uranium-Series Dates from Travertines Associated with a Late Pleistocene Megafauna in ACb-3, Alabama”

Southeastern Geology 1992

Landscape Paintings by Philip Juras

July 9, 2015

The kind of natural environments I’d like to see are either extinct or currently exist as tiny remnants.  It’s too hot this time of year to get in a car and drive for hours to visit any of these remnant landscapes.  Instead, I like to relax and open up a book entitled The Southern Frontier: Landscapes Inspired by Bartram’s Travels by Philip Juras.  This artist paints landscapes that were once common across the southeast but now exist as rare relics.  In some cases the environments he portrays no longer exist at all, and he has to base his work on descriptions William Bartram made about his travels through the region in 1775/1776.

My favorite landscape is the open oak savannah of the piedmont region.  I’ve written a series for my blog about my imaginary life in a wilderness located in the Georgia piedmont 36,000 years ago.  I envision my wilderness homestead surrounded by open oak savannah as depicted in the below illustrations.

Old growth oak savannah painted by Philip Juras. Imagine centuries old trees with a grassy understory.

Painting of an old growth oak savannah at Sprewell Bluff.  Imagine bison, horses, and mammoths here as they were during the Pleistocene.

Anthony Shoals on the Broad River.  This is what Piedmont rivers originally looked like.  If I lived near these shoals during the Pleistocene, I’d set fish traps up here.

Depiction of the Kiowee Valley, South Carolina as it was in 1775.  Today, this valley is inundated by a reservoir.  This is so beautifulWhat do I like best about it?  No sign of people.

Evidence from pollen records shows that the abundance of oaks and other hardwoods increased while the abundance of pine decreased during warm interstadials and interglacials.   Broad-leafed trees outcompete pines in climates with greater precipitation, milder temperatures, and higher concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.  Conversely, pines predominate over broad-leafed trees in colder windier conditions with lower atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, such as occurred during Ice Age stadials.  Natural fires and the grazing, trampling, and foraging of megafauna kept oak woodlands more open during the Pleistocene than modern day woods.  Later, Indians frequently set fire to the woods, maintaining these primeval oak savannahs.  Light grass fires killed saplings, but mature oaks are fire resistant, and burned grass re-sprouts from underground roots.

I like oak savannahs because this type of environment supports a large population of wildlife, and the open nature allows for easy wildlife viewing.  During the Pleistocene a piedmont oak savannah was home for mammoth, bison, horse, peccaries, tapir, deer, elk (probably not until 15,000 BP), llamas, and bear.  Predators attracted to these prey species included saber-tooth, giant lion, jaguar, cougar, bobcat, dire wolf, and coyote.  Squirrels were even more abundant than they are today, and cottontails thrived in thickets left per chance unburned.  Big flocks of turkeys, passenger pigeons, and hundreds of species of songbirds frequented oak savannah.  Just imagine all the wildlife that could be seen from just a glance out the window of a homestead built in the middle of a Pleistocene piedmont oak savannah.

Philip Juras did find a rare remnant of an oak savannah in western Georgia located in Sprewell Bluff State Park.  When I drive through the countryside, I occasionally see an acre or so with old growth oaks and a grassy understory.  I remember seeing an example of this environment on the other side of the road near the base of Ladds Mountain in Bartow County.  This environment is rare now because men have clear cut and cultivated so much of the original landscape.  When the land is eventually left fallow, it doesn’t come back like it used to be.  Men suppress fires and build roads that act as firebreaks.  The native grasses no longer occur in the seed bank, and the soil has been used and eroded.  The trees grow thick on poor soil without light grass fire tinder.  It’s nothing like it used to be.  Pines predominate in the piedmont today, but circa 1704 John Lawson traveled a day through the North Carolina piedmont without seeing a single pine tree.  Instead, the land was covered by oaks and other hardwoods.

Since Philip Juras published his book, he’s continued painting landscapes.  He’s traveled to Little St. Simon’s Island, Martha’s Vineyard, and Colombia.  He’s posted these new paintings on his website http://www.philipjuras.com/  Here’s 1 of my favorite new paintings of his.

This is a freshwater wetland known as Goose  Pond on Little St. Simon’s Island.

The Shrinking Brain

July 5, 2015

Humans (Homo sapiens), like all other organisms, are continuously evolving, and the forces that shape human evolution have also changed.  Before the development of agriculture, ecological pressures were the primary influence on human evolution.  Human populations were scattered and low.  Each individual had to work and think harder then because survival in primitive environments required greater endurance and intelligence.  Pleistocene Homo sapiens had to do it all.  On average Cro-magnon man, also known as European early modern humans, had larger jaws and teeth, a bigger lung capacity, and a larger cranial capacity than present day man.  The average cranial capacity of a human being living 20,000 years ago was 1500 cubic centimeters compared to 1350 cubic centimeters for an average human today.  This larger brain capacity does mean they were more intelligent, but of course lacked our present day knowledge.  During the agricultural revolution social competition replaced ecological processes as the primary influence on human evolution.  This led to a division of labor, reducing the need for such a large cranial capacity.  Human intelligence has declined all over the world since.

Shrinking Brain in Humans

Modern humans have a smaller brain capacity than their recent ancestors.  Incidentally, this illustration is misleading.  Homo sapiens did not evolve from Neanderthals.  Instead, Homo sapiens and Homo neandethalis shared a common ancestor–Homo heidelbergensis. Homo Neanderthals were also a distinct species, not a subspecies.

Domesticated cattle, sheep, goats, and dogs also have smaller cranial capacities than their wild ancestors.  Humans culled the larger, wilder individuals; creating tamer breeds.  Humans culled people who didn’t conform to society’s rules as well.  In this way humans may have eliminated many people with larger brains that just couldn’t fit in.  One study of a primitive society in New Guinea showed that as much as 10% of the males were executed because they couldn’t follow society’s rules.  The death penalty selects for tamer humans by eliminating aggressive individuals from the gene pool.  The death penalty was also common in western societies until the 20th century.

Aggressive intelligent humans had a big advantage over tame humans when the world was a wild place.  But some of the characteristics that favored survival in a wilderness are counterproductive in a civilization  dependent upon the rule of law to prevent chaos.

Human cranial capacity is on the increase again.  Over the past 200 years there has been a major improvement in the average human’s diet.  Better nutrition is leading to larger cranial capacities.  The brain is a large fatty organ that requires a great deal of energy.  With a better food supply humans with large brains are more likely to survive.  However, I believe this recent trend is temporary.  I predict future generations will suffer from greater incidences of malnutrition as the world population outstrips the ability of farmers to produce enough food for everybody.

References:

Bailey, Drew; and David Geary

“Hominid Brain Evolution: Testing Climatic, Ecological, and Social Competition Models”

Human Nature 2009

McAuliffe, Kathleen

“If Modern Humans are so Smart, why are our Brains Shrinking?”

Discover Magazine 2010

How to sell Books with a Misleading Premise

June 30, 2015

I finished reading The Invaders: How Humans and their Dogs Drove Neanderthals to Extinction by Pat Shipman, and it left me shaking my head in confusion.  The author debunked the title of her book on page 213 when she wrote “…there are no well-dated Neanderthal sites younger than about 40,000 years ago; all are older.  Unless future finds show wolf-dogs in even earlier sites, Neanderthals were extinct by the time wolf-dogs appeared.”  If Neanderthals were extinct by the time humans supposedly began working with “wolf-dogs,” the human-dog connection can’t possibly be the reason Neanderthals became extinct.  I think the author invented a sensationalist title to sell copies of a book that is based on a completely unfounded premise.  Perhaps it was the publisher’s idea.  The last chapter of this book seems to be an incoherent add-on.

The Invaders: How Humans and Their Dogs Drove Neanderthals to Extinction

The author of this book convincingly refutes her own premise.

The premise of her book depends upon 1 highly controversial study.  This study used a complex statistical analysis of dog and wolf skull measurements to differentiate between the 2.  These scientists measured a skull from Goyet Cave, Belgium; dating to 36,000 calendar years BP, and determined it had a 99% chance of being from a dog.  Prior to this find, it was thought humans didn’t domesticate dogs until about 14,000 BP.  Some other canid skulls measured in this study, dating to older than 14,000 BP, were also determined to be dog rather than wolf.  However, another study (referenced below) completely contradicts this conclusion.  These scientists used a 3-D morphometric analysis of the same ancient canid skulls and determined the Goyet Cave specimen and others of similar age were wolf, not dog.  A DNA study of these specimens determined these particular canids were not ancestral to modern dogs or extant wolves.  They were probably just an extinct ecomorph of wolf.  Alas for Pat Shipman, her hypothesis is a poorly reasoned fantasy.

Humans didn’t need dogs to rub out Neanderthals.  Humans likely had far superior organizational skills as well as advanced technology such as projectile weapons and knitting needles.  Humans could survive in a colder climate with better clothing and could successfully hunt animals on open plains.  I’m certain humans beat Neanderthals in battle by using strategy and tactics.  I do think humans were the sole factor in the extinction of Neanderthals.  If Homo sapiens never colonized Europe, Neanderthals would still be there today.  Climate change can’t be the reason for their extinction because Neanderthals survived dozens of dramatic shifts in climate phases during their >250,000 year occupation of Europe.

I found a couple of other minor mistakes in The Invaders worth noting.  This isn’t a big deal–I know there are mistakes on my blog, but I’m too lazy to go back and edit corrections.  The late surviving population of mammoths on Wrangel Island lasted until 4000 BP, not 3000 BP, and they were not a dwarf population as Pat Shipman mistakenly claimed.  They were fully-sized woolly mammoths (Mammuthus primigenius).  She also reproduced a graph in her book from a study that mistakenly classifies the aurochs (Bos taurus), the ancestor of modern cattle, as a steppe environment inhabitant.  The aurochs favored habitat was riparian woodland.  Cattle need frequent access to water and are not well adapted to arid grassland habitat.

Reference:

Drake, Abby; et. al.

“3D Morphometric Analysis of Fossil Canid Skulls Contradicts Domestication of Dogs during the Late Paleolithic”

Scientific Reports 2015

Did Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalis) really Interbreed with Humans (Homo sapiens)?

June 26, 2015

Warning: Do not read this blog entry, if you are younger than 18.  The nude images might cause blindness.

A new study published in the scientific journal, Nature, of a 40,000 year old skull suggests Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalis) interbred with humans (Homo sapiens).  This particular specimen, found in Romania, is thought to be 6%-9% Neanderthal, and the authors of this study think this individual had a great-great-great-great Neanderthal grandparent.  He left no living  descendants, but other studies of Neanderthal DNA determined Homo sapiens and Homo neandetheralis did hybridize, and some modern Europeans and Asians might be 1%-3% Neanderthal.  The media likes this story, and a study casting doubt on the assumptions used to identify past hybridization is being ignored.  I didn’t even see the study listed in the new journal article’s references, so the scientists involved in Neanderthal DNA studies are unaware of the article or are ignoring it as well.

The ignored study, referenced below, was written by A. Ericksson and A. Manica.  They write “tests for hybridization rely on the degree to which different modern populations share genetic polymorphisms with genomes of other hominins.”  A polymorphism is defined as 2 clearly different phenotypes existing in the same population of a species.  A phenotype is the composite of an organisms observable characteristics.  For example a population of humans could consist of big blondes and small brunettes–2 different phenotypes.  The authors of this study show that examples of shared polymorphism attributed to hybridization could actually have originated before H. neanderthalis and H. sapiens diverged over 200,000 years ago.  Both species of humans evolved from H. heidelbergensis.  The population of H. heidelbergensis that colonized Europe evolved into H. neanderthalis.  The population of H. heidelbergensis that stayed in Africa until ~45,000 years ago evolved into H. sapiens.  An Asian colonization evolved into the poorly known Denisovans.

The authors of this study believe their findings don’t rule out the possibility of hybridization in Europe, but they urge “caution” when making the assumption that hybridization occurred.  To determine whether or not the degree of shared polymorphism was the result of hybridization or was part of an earlier genetic pattern from the founding population structure would require DNA from a specimen pre-dating the divergence of these 2 species.  Viable DNA can’t be extracted from specimens that old.

Neanderthal-2.jpg

Representation of a female Neanderthal based on DNA studies.  Note the red hair.  Neanderthals had red hair.

Nude female Homo sapiens.  Human women are much cuter than Homo neanderthalis.  Moreover, female Neanderthals were probably considerably stronger than male Homo sapiens.  I doubt the 2 species interbred.  Genetic studies can’t discern certain hybridization without studying the DNA of the ancestral common ancestor of both species.  This is impossible because those fossils are too old to harbor DNA.

I doubt H. sapiens bred with H. neanderthalis.  The 2 populations of humans had been isolated from each other for over 200,000 years.  Behavior patterns likely dramatically differed. Facial features were significantly different, and I think they didn’t recognize each other as mating material.  Neanderthals were intelligent ambush predators that used thrusting weapons, and they were physically more powerful than humans.  But humans were smarter and had developed projectile weapons.  Humans ate a wider variety of foodstuffs, contributing to greater fertility.  I think humans wiped out Neanderthals within a few thousand years.  Assimilation was unlikely.

Reference:

Ericksson, A.; and A. Manica

“Effect of Ancient Population Structure on the Degree of Polymorphism Shared between Modern Human Populations and Ancient Hominins”

PNAS 2012

http://www.pnas.org/content/109/35/13956.full


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 302 other followers