Little Kettle Creek excites me because it is the closest Pleistocene fossil site to where I live. It is the only known Ice Age fossil site in the entire piedmont region. Bogue Chitto Creek in Alabama is in the northern coastal plain, and Ladds in north Georgia is in the southern ridge and valley, so there are other fossil sites close to this geographic region, but Little Kettle Creek is the only one actually in it. Its discovery 40 years ago sparked hopes that it would lead to discoveries of more sites in the region but that hasn’t happened. But I believe it can’t be the only one and some day I hope to find another piedmont fossil site.
The word, kettle, is a derivative of kittle which is an archaic word for fish trap. In the days before supermarkets Indians and early pioneers likely laced the creek with fish traps for easy suppers while they were busy clearing land and working in the fields. A Revolutionary War battle fought here demoralized the British, so the area has plenty of interesting history, despite being off the beaten path–the county population is a mere ~10,000 and early town leaders rejected the development of railroad lines through here because they considered trains “faddish, noisy, and dirty.” Eventually, railroad lines were built, but by then, the rest of the state had passed this county by.
Location of the Little Kettle Creek fossil site. From a copy of the below referenced paper.
A photo of Little Kettle Creek on property for sale. This photo is probably a few hundred yards downstream from the fossil site. Fossils were found in sediment accumulated behind granite dikes like those seen in this photo.
I found land for sale near this site. For $235,000 one can buy 65.12 acres of nice timber land where he/she can hunt deer and dove, fish the creek, and prospect for fossils and artifacts. However, the only building on the site is an ancient barn. It may be heaven for me, but my wife doesn’t appreciate the lack of amenities.
Most of the fossils were discovered in an accumulation of sediment trapped behind a granite dike similar to those shown in the photo above. The son of the then property owner discovered a partial mastodon tooth 100 yards downstream from the dike but all but one other specimen were found behind the natural rock dike. The whole area is underlain by pre-Cambrian age granite which is eroding at different rates. This accounts for the uneven distribution of the granite outcroppings. Pleistocene sediment overlays this. I’ve thought about this for a long time and believe the creek must cut through a large undiscovered Pleistocene deposit farther upstream from the site. The fossils washed downstream (and may still be periodically washing into the same dike) to become lodged behind the rocky impediments.
Dr. Voorhies and his students scoured the area for fossils and found specimens of 7 species. Here’s the list.
–a vertebrae and pectoral fins that compare favorably to a channel catfish
–2 cheek teeth of a southern bog lemming, a species that no longer occurs south of Kentucky
–a tooth that compares favorably to the red backed vole, a species that no longer occurs south of extreme northeast Georgia in the mountains
–2 partial teeth of a mastodon
–a partial mammoth tooth
–teeth, metacarpals, and phalanxes from bison
–teeth and metatarsals from white tailed deer
The catfish bones show growth rings similar in size to those from fish that live in midwestern states where fish stop growing in the winter. Fish in modern day southeastern states don’t show these size growth rings. That means the climate at the time these fossils were living creatures must have included colder winters than those of today in this region.
I’m planning a trip early this summer to visit Wilkes County. In addition to the fossil site, the Revolutionary War monument is worth seeing, and I’m curious as to whether I can find William Bartram’s “Great Buffalo Lick,” which reportedly an historian has determined is nearby. Of course, I’ll recount the day trip on this blog.
References:
Voorhies, M.R.
“Pleistocene Vertebrates with Boreal Affinities in the Georgia Piedmont”
Quaternary Research (4) 85-93 1974