Llama and Deer Abundance during the Pleistocene in Southeastern North America

Studies of bone chemistry suggest the species of North American llamas that lived in North America during the Pleistocene enjoyed a diet similar to that of the white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus).  The species of llamas that co-existed with deer then were the large-headed (Hemiauchenia macrocephala) and the stout-legged (Paleolama mirifica).  Evidence determined from the below referenced studies suggests the large-headed llama preferred open woodland habitat because it was a mixed feeder capable of grazing grasses and browsing on trees and shrubs.   One scientist thinks they may have grazed on green grass during the summer and browsed on woody vegetation during the winter.  In any case it was a very adaptable species with a wide geographic and temporal range, having existed for over 2 million years.  The stout-legged llama was a denizen of deep forests, dependent upon browsing the plant foods found in shady environments.  White-tailed deer are also browsers that prefer deep forest and forest edge.  I’ve considered the ecological interrelationship between Pleistocene llamas and deer and have reached some hypothetical conclusions about the former abundance and distribution of each species.

Llama, deer | by mezzoblue

Llama and deer on a farmed ranch.  Llama and deer co-existed in southeastern North America during the Pleistocene and consumed many of the same plant foods.  Llamas are closely related to camels.

The large-headed llama was probably far more abundant in Florida during the Pleistocene than white-tailed deer based on the abundance of each in the fossil record.  The former species has been found at over 60 fossil sites in Florida.  Remains of this species have been found off the coast of Georgia (which was above sea level during glacial episodes) as well as the coastal plains of South Carolina and Texas.  The large-headed llama also ranged from southern California north to Washington, Idaho, South Dakota, and southern Canada.  Their range included Oklahoma, Kansas, and Nebraska as well.  Curiously, no certain remains of this species have been found from central Georgia north to Wisconsin and Maine.  Clayton Ray, former curator for the National Museum of Natural History, commented that a partial tooth found at Ladds in Bartow County, Georgia resembled a “camelid” but was not enough evidence to definitely state the presence of llamas there.  Based on the geographical occurrence of this species’ remains and isotopic evidence suggesting it preferred open woodlands, I’ve concluded its Pleistocene range extended from western North America to the southeastern coastal plain and Florida.  Many species of western plants are found on the southeastern coastal plain where they occur as relics, and this is evidence an ecologically similar corridor once connected western prairies to southeastern savannahs.  The large-headed llama likely was a common animal of long-leaf pine savannahs that formerly prevailed on southeastern coastal plains.  Their fossil remains are so common at the Harleyville fossil site in South Carolina that it is known as “camelot.”  This site dates to 400,000 years ago before bison colonized the region.  Llamas had even less competition for food during the middle Pleistocene.

White-tailed deer and long-nosed peccaries (Mylohyus nasatus) were likely the most common hooved animals in north Georgia during the late Pleistocene based on their abundance in the fossil record here.  This is evidence that forests grew more dense to the north of the coastal plain.  There is not enough fossil or pollen evidence to determine where exactly in the piedmont forests began to become more dense.  The latitude where the density of the canopy increased from open woodland to closed forest fluctuated depending upon climatic cycles and other factors.  Despite the lack of fossil evidence, I believe large-headed llamas occasionally ranged into the piedmont and mountain regions of the south whenever habitat became favorable.  They advanced wherever forests became more open.  But deer were probably more common than llamas in the upper south for most of the Pleistocene.

Fossil remains of the stout-legged llama seem to be restricted to Florida and the coastal plain of Texas south to South America.  This suggests the stout-legged llama was not as cold tolerant as its cousin.  Instead, they preferred warm sub-tropical forest.

Both species of North American llamas were 2 to 3 times larger than white-tailed deer.  Large-headed llamas grew to 660 pounds, while stout-legged llamas reached 600 pounds.  Their larger size meant they reproduced more slowly than white-tailed deer and were less able to withstand human hunting pressure.  Changing climatic conditions could not have caused their extinctions because the foods they ate always remained abundant.  White-tailed deer populations, especially in Florida but wherever their ranges overlapped, increased following the extinctions of llamas because they no longer had to share the edible plant material the environment provided.

References:

Kohn, Matthes; and M. McKay

“Dining in the Pleistocene: who’s on the menu”

Geology 33 (8) 2005

Yann, L.; and L. Desantis

“Effects of Pleistocene Climates on Local Environments and Dietary Behavior of Mammals in Florida”

Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology,  Palaeoecology 2014

Advertisements

Tags: , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: